Showing posts with label Biographies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Biographies. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

3 amazing conversions

    1. Conversion of St. Augustine

There were several significant rational turning points in Augustine's life before he came to Christ. First, was reasoned out of Manichaean dualism. One significant turning point here was the success of a young Christian debater of Manicheans called Helpidius (see The Confessions).

Second, Augustine reasoned his way out of total skepticism by seeing the self-defeating nature of it (see his Against the Academics).

Third, where it not for studying Plotinus, Augustine informs us that he would not even been able to conceive of a spiritual being, let alone believe in one (see The Confessions).

    2. Conversion of Frank Morrison

This skeptic set out to disprove Christianity by showing the resurrection never occurred. The quest ended with his conversion and a book titled Who Moved the Stone? in which the first chapter was titled "The Book That Refused to be Written"!

    3. Conversion of Simon Greenleaf

At the turn of the century the Professor of Law at Harvard, who wrote the book on legal evidence, was challenged by students to apply the rules of legal evidence to the New Testament to see if its testimony would stand up in court. The result was a book titled The Testimony of the Evangelists in which he reported his own conversion to Christianity.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Hobbes - and his philosophy without God

Thomas Hobbes
Job 41: Leviathan-
Presupposition- Since there is no God and man will not act rightly towards eachother we need to make a contract where men will do rightly by one another. Hobbes fails to make the move that behind creation there is a creator. If a beast can make us tremble imagine what the God who created the beast.
Born 1588- 1679: lived to 91 years old. 1588- year of the Spanish armada His father was a priest who was a gambler and struck another priest in the face. Spanish armada was coming to conquer England and reverse the reformation. Born 2 months early- Thomas means twins. “Me and fear”. Fear drives his politics. 1628- translated the Peloponnesian wars into English.
Thucydides – is there justice? How did the Athenians get away with injustices in the Peloponnesian wars if it is. The eventual decline of the empire is the reason. People have been slaughtered over the ideas of the philosophers. Hobbes is a main disciple of Thucydides and is seen as atheistic, not a member of the poets. Hobbes is promoting the Leviathan who promotes peace because he has all power. 1646- Hobbes became the tutor to Charles II. Paris.
Born prematurely out of fear, lived through a civil war. Goes on to say that the state of man is war against every man against every man. This is a result of reading Thucydides and experience through his own life. Every man for himself in times of crisis Humans under diress, stress and fear show their true selves…selfishness.
Prefers the Monarchy- not a benevolent monarchy. The Parliament revolts against the Kings authority and in 1645 Oliver Cromwell defeats the royalists and in 1646 Charles the 1 surrenders. 1st non-monarchical government in England Charles 1 beheaded by protestants Tudor of the next King Charles II The one right a monarch cannot take away from you is the right to self-preservation. Christianity submits to justice, the order of God.
1661- Charles the 2nd retakes throne
1663- Westminster Confession of faith written
Hobbes refers to the confession. Hobbes wrote on many things, well educated. Hobbes first social contract- Descartes and Bacon Atheistic materialist philosophy-1666- books were banned and burned) at Oxford. Amazing effect having the church rise up . The beast of Malmesbury.
Machiavelli and Hobbes- Social Contract- basic thought is simple. Since there is god than the servants are going to kill us. You want the people to believe in god so they will have a fear of justice. Hobbes embraces Machiavelli and shouts out the noble lie that there is a god. The Machiavellian theory rids authorities. Hobbes believes men sprouted up like mushrooms and begins higher criticism. Hobbes is the first of the higher critics. Attacks the scripture.
Total materialism- new anthropology What is man determines man’s purpose.? If you give a new anthropology and man is just a machine than virtue is lost and what it leads to is that society is not natural but fabricated. Man is one viscious animal against another.
Political match between Machiavelli and Hobbes- One of them Hobbes by indoctrination the masses with fear he wants a tyrant. Peace is artificial. Both woman are breaking up the mid evil synthesis. Machiavelli is destroying and discarding the soul. The lynchpin to ethics is the day of judgment. Societal ethics based on self preservation and there is no day of judgment. Machiavelli’s project is geared toward the prince. Hobbes wants a tyrant until he turns the sword you can run.
Politics- How can through our laws promote virtue so man can achieve his wholeness. Are we animals who’s natural state is war? How can we fulfill our goal of people trying to fulfill our virtue- Hobbes believes we are violent self slaying animals. Laws have nothing to do with morals its just self survival. The new interest is not justice but self preservation. They both promote a philosophy of fear for the masses.
The noble lie- the 3rd party Leviathan Everyone by social contract agrees to give all the power to the prince. The Prince is the one alone who is feared. Someone out there has the power to punish.
Anthropology- State of nature- one of the big lines
“Solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short. “- Man’s life. If there is no resurrection than we can live as we please. If there was not the work of the holy spirit than I would argue this book to have been written by man. Who we are is going to determine how we live. Aristotle believes that man is a social or political creature. That means that the state of nature is to be in community. The household is the microcosm of the household, which is the family. Nature- man, woman produces children Bonds of nature.
State of the war against all against all – In the state of nature we are always in a state of war. State of nature isn’t the state we are in because our laws are artificial but in a real situation people become every man for himself. Fight for what little there is. (scarcity). Preparation for the Leviathan In the state of nature there is no right or wrong. Ethics has become situational. There is no right and wrong. There is no law without the power to enforce it.
No right and wrong, no property, no morality, no virtue or honor- no peace only fears Absence of love. Perpetual war. The dominant law in the state of nature is survival of the fittest. Seize what you can promise what you will. In the state of nature ones right is always self-preservation. The one right that I have since I exist is self-preservation. Man is all passion. Danger of the passions need to be joint together but man is all passion and reason cannot rule Appetitive and pleasures and pains). That’s the way you deal with people. Love is an appetite and attraction. Man is very simple and they are motivated with either pleasure or pain. Have them fear death. Man is all material and there is no paranormal. Man is all matter and his imagination is motion of matter and it is all mechanical. This is contrary to the platonic soul- the city is the soul writ large. Man is a beast strung up from the slime like mushrooms.

Notes on Thomas Aquinas

Thomas Aquinas-
Natural Revelation Psalm 19:1-6 God reveals himself through what he made.
Special Revelation- God reveals himself through Scripture and the wisdom of the spirit. Only by special revelation can a person be saved. Law of the Lord
Natural revelation can only take us to the tomb of the Unknown God. Acts.
All knowledge, all truth is God’s truth; everything gives us truth about God.
The Great Synthesis- known for synthesizing all things under God (Athens and Jerusalem). Boethius quotes a lot of Plato, Augustine, Aristotle had been lost to the Arabs but had been recovered. Brings together all streams.
2. Context- Aristotle lost to the west – Aristotle became the voice for truth by reason. Threat of Aristotle- easier to reconcile Plato with Christianity rather than Aristotle Plato was always heavenly minded as opposed to Aristotle who is not looking for the city of heaven but catalogs all things of this world. Aristotle banned because a lot of the things he says conflict with Christianity. Plato and Christianity had been synthesized.
Judaism and Aristotle- Maimonides
Islam and Aristotle- Averroes
Christianity and Aristotle- Aquinas
Whatever is true belongs to God and we need to collect it and bring it under the Christian umbrella.
What are the stakes of the synthesis between Aristotle and Christianity? The integrity of (God’s truth). Averroestits- “double truth theory”. What we embrace as true must not contradict what we hold true in religion. There’s no way there can be 2 types of truth. The first principle of logic is there cannot be contradiction. Aristotle is coming into the west through Islam and bringing these ideas. True truth cannot contradict the scriptures.
Tension between Augustine and Aquinas- Aquinas factoring Aristotle and Augustine factoring in Plato Issues of tension Different attitudes towards creation
Augustine picks up on Pauline teaching of total depravity. Aquinas agrees we need special grace or a supernatural work ….reason enlightened by grace.
Plato vs. Aristotle- heavenly city vs. God’s kingdom on earth- we are to pray that Gods kingdom is lived out on earth yet our hope is in the heavenly city. Balance between both emphasis.

Plato -------→ Augustine---------→Luther/ Protestantism (Faith alone--→Scriptures)
Aristotle--------→ Aquinas/Roman Catholicism---→(Faith and reason)---→tradition and scriptures/ church fathers.
Calvin---→the glory of God in all the things of God. Doctrine and the priesthood of the believers-----→ the shoemaker has just as much a calling as the pastor and we are to do all things for the glory of God.
Theological implications------→ Augustine…..emphasis /sin and fall----Gospel
Aquinas-------→creation----→ telos (end) oriented
(Beatific vision)
Being saved is not the end but it is the beginning of the journey onward.
What is the chief end of man?
The chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever.
We can ascend back to God because he descended to us.
3. Aristotelian influence- End driven theology and ethics.
B. Value of natural reasoning (reason b itself) Scripture plus tradition vs. scripture alone
True truth- God’s truth. What’s the problem with using true truth along with scriptural truth?
The philosopher’s passion is to gather truth to know truth. Finding God’s truth in everything. Aristotle wanted to catalog and study all areas of science. Broadest philosopher as to study the most things Aquinas wants to see all things under God’s truth. The value of natural reasoning is to synthesis the ladders.
Reason Scriptures Revelation
Philosophy Philosophy/Theology Theology Truth that is demonstrated by reason
Reason Reason/ experience Faith
Reason+ 1=1=2
Revealed truth by reason= the existence of God through nature
Scriptures/ Revelation= Trinity/ character of God. Incarnation salvific plan and love
(There can be no contradictions regarding any of this truth). The area of mixed articles- truth that you can learn by reason and revelation you cannot ascend to God by reason along but you need the revelation of the scriptures. There’s nothing wrong with refuting a pagan with his own rules reason without revelation.
Epistemology- the study of knowledge and deriving truth to know
Aquinas knows faith and reason can be reconciled. The God of the Bible created the world so everything that is true comes from God and has its ending in God and it cannot contradict. All truth is God’s truth.
Natural revelation- (God reveals through creation) the heavens declare the glory of God Psalm 19. Mediate revelation- it is not direct but indirect. Direct revelation is the beatific unmediated vision of God. God who is unseen and invisible
*Analogical-
You can use words univocally which means the word means the exact.
Equivocally- the word has lost its meaning in a different context. We can speak about a word that may have other meanings.
Analogically- analogy.
Reason is our imago deo- natural revelation is incomplete. As far as reason can get you is to the existence of the ultimate monotheism. Natural revelation is incomplete but that doesn’t mean we should reject it. Natural revelation is mediate, analogical and complete but only true as far as it goes. Truth reflects God, leads to God, reveals God.
Atheism- the rejection of God – natural revelation an reason for the existence of G-d. All truth is repugnant to the devil so Aquinas tries to gather all truth and throw it In the face of the devil.
Virgil- Reason says I can take you no farther. Grace leads to divine revelation through faith.
If we had to reason our way to salvation it would only reach a very small amunt of people. The gospel reaches even the lowest of men. The lttle old lady in the back of the church cannot reason but all she needs to know is God.
Romans 1- confronting the people with reason alone before he gets into the oracles of God
Every mouth is stopped before God
Natural theology vs. Special revelation theology
Natural theology- what we can by reason study of God through nature
NEW CLASS
Colossions 1:15-20 Christ is the one through whom all things came to be and will reconcile all things ack to himself. Firstborn of all creation, head over all of the church.
Aristotelian influence. – knowledge apart from divine revelation. If u love truth u love wisdom, want to learn about everything. Aristolte is now adding a new voice in the west and plato had been taken in the Christian world view. Aquinas takes some things from Aristotle but throws some things away. All truth belongs to God. You cannot embrace the gospel or see the things of the spirit without God’s intervention. Pagans by the common grace of God have the ability to find truth but it still belongs to God.
Machiavelli, Hume Imperialism- only knowledge comes from senses. Impericist only trusts his senses. Religion and philosophy broke synthesis after Machiavelli.
Faith- there is more than the senses. Driving their faith to the word of God. Natural theology for what little it is it I mediated and is analogical the wisdom of God is different from that of man and it is incomplete. We need divine revelation. We need grace to complete nature. It is important to see that grac in the ultimate sense will complete our human nature until we are glorified. This comes out in practicality when we talk about virtues. 4 cardinal virtues.
1. Wisdom
2. Justice
3. Moderation
4. Justice
Grace does not obliterate nature but completes it. Grace causes nature to ascend to a higher level.
1. Faith
2. Hope
3. Love=7 virtues.

A. Wisdom
B. Justice
C. Moderation
D. Justice
E. Faith
F. Hope
G. Love



Proofs for the existence of God- You can’t fight logic (Its an absolute statement to say there is no absolute truth.)
1. The arguments from Change- Change is everywhere. Someone causes it (unmoved mover). There must be a God…..Dominoes- must be pushed.
2. The arguments of causation. Who causes causes? Is there a first cause, itself uncaused? Aquinas says there is an uncaused cause. The world is an effect. What caused it?
3. The argument from contingency- a necessary being. Something that has to be in the ultimate sense.
4. The argument for the degrees of excellence. We notice degrees of excellence in nature. This implies the notion of perfection; there must be a perfect being. (Various levels of goodness or perfection). Is there a finish line to the morality race. ) There must be the best.
5. The argument from harmony. Fish have water to swim in as well as fins. There is a designer. God. (Cosmological argument). Based on creation. There is no way that there is not a creator.
Aristotles 4 causes-
1. Formal cause-worker
2. Material-marble
3. Efficient-tools
4. Final cause-statue
Hierarchy- everything has its place. Categorizing of the angels. Writing a lot about angels. Angelic Dr. ST> THOMAS AQUINAS.
Natural order of creation. Creation is made in a natural order.
1. God created the world in wisdom so that the world is well ordered and good. If these guys want to live without God they will essentially eventually get what they wanted.
2. All creation bears the fingerprint of God.
3. Living things share in the life of God. (being). Necessary being and gradations. Matter is dependant on God and must derive its being from God.

The Great chain of being- everything has a gradation of being.
God being at the top and matter being at the bottom just before nothingness The ant has nephras. Apart from God as a necessary being there cannot be the substance or sustination of anything. There is a realm of the visible and theinvisible. How do we cross the line- analogy. Grace. Reason alone cannot get us to God.
There is an infinite gap between the creator and the uncreated.
Impericism. Hobbs- Social contracture
The life in any creature is not absent from God. Life in the swaying branches. Sharing the life of God there is no life outside of God does not create independent life The fountain of life is God and all things have their being in him.

Application-
1. Not emanation- (spill over)- Creation is a spill over of God. Pg 189-93 199 God did not have a need to create but he wanted to according to his will. Everything he created is according to his goodness. NOT pantheism. Worship the creator not the created. The universe is not God body.
The very things the world despises is what we glory in. Isaiah 53
Philippians 2 Suffering is necessary for glory.
Aquinas- Left over’s……
Law-
1. Ordination of reason
2. For the common good
3. Promulgated by authority
4 kinds of law-
1. Eternal law- the way God governs the universe by divine reason
2. Natural law- the expression of law by nature….union between man and woman can produce children. Socrates- it is against nature.
3. Human law- Seeks to establish natural law or human government and society
4. Divine law
All laws had the goal of the common good and morality in general. Our purpose is to live virtuously.
Just War-
1. Authority of ruler to engage in war.
2. Just cause- response to an offence
3. Right intentions
What is the final good that comes about by engaging in the conflict.
Grace perfects it doesn’t undo nature.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Martin Luther

Martin Luther
Gutenberg invents movable type in 1450 (Printing Press).
1483 Luther born in Eisleben (November 10)
1501 Luther begins study at University of Erfurt
1505 Luther plans to attend law school under the wishes of his father.
1505- July 2. Caught in a violent Thunderstorm and pledges to be a monk.
Luther had recently completed a Master's degree and started his law studies at the University of Erfurt. He was on his way back to Erfurt after having visited his parents when he was caught in a terrible thunderstorm a few hours outside of Erfurt. Lightning struck near him and he was thrown to the ground by the air pressure it created. At this moment he called to Saint Anne: "I will become a monk!"
Luther commented on this event later. It is assumed that he had played with the idea of becoming a monk even before the storm hit.
To his Fathers disgust and anger, Luther honored his solemn promise; he had one last party with university friends on July 16 and the next day he entered the Monastery in Erfurt to become a monk.
1507- Studies theology at Erfurt
1510-1511 Visits Rome (Believes it to be “like the holy land” and notices it is a far cry from holy.) Prostitution, Indulgences etc After this experience he tried harder to make sure he was right with God.
1512- Receives a Doctorate and begins as a Professor of Theology at Wittenberg University. Luther Lectures through Psalms, Galatians and Romans.

Luther’s Account of his own Conversion (1515) Romans 1:16-17
“Meanwhile, I had already during that year returned to interpret the Psalter anew. I had confidence in the fact that I was more skilful, after I had lectured in the university on St. Paul's epistles to the Romans, to the Galatians, and the one to the Hebrews. I had indeed been captivated with an extraordinary ardor for understanding Paul in the Epistle to the Romans. But up till then it was not the cold blood about the heart, but a single word in Chapter 1, "In it the righteousness of God is revealed," that had stood in my way. For I hated that word "righteousness of God," which, according to the use and custom of all the teachers, I had been taught to understand philosophically regarding the formal or active righteousness, as they call it, with which God is righteous and punishes the unrighteous sinner.
Though I lived as a monk without reproach, I felt that I was a sinner before God with an extremely disturbed conscience. I could not believe that he was placated by my satisfaction. I did not love, yes, I hated the righteous God who punishes sinners, and secretly, if not blasphemously, certainly murmuring greatly, I was angry with God, and said, "As if, indeed, it is not enough, that miserable sinners, eternally lost through original sin, are crushed by every kind of calamity by the law of the decalogue, without having God add pain to pain by the gospel and also by the gospel threatening us with his righteousness and wrath!" Thus I raged with a fierce and troubled conscience. Nevertheless, I beat importunately upon Paul at that place, most ardently desiring to know what St. Paul wanted.
At last, by the mercy of God, meditating day and night, I gave heed to the context of the words, namely, "In it the righteousness of God is revealed, as it is written, 'He who through faith is righteous shall live.'" There I began to understand that the righteousness of God is that by which the righteous lives by a gift of God, namely by faith. And this is the meaning: the righteousness of God is revealed by the gospel, namely, the passive righteousness with which merciful God justifies us by faith, as it is written, "He who through faith is righteous shall live." Here I felt that I was altogether born again and had entered paradise itself through open gates. There a totally other face of the entire Scripture showed itself to me. Thereupon I ran through the Scripture from memory. I also fount in other terms an analogy, as, the work of God, that is what God does in us, the power of God, with which he makes us wise, the strenght of God, the salvation of God, the glory of God.
And I extolled my sweetest word with a love as great as the hatred with which I had before hated the word "righteousness of God." Thus that place in Paul was for me truly the gate to paradise. Later I read Augustine's The Spirit and the Letter, where contrary to hope I found that he, too, interpreted God's righteousness in a similar way, as the righteousness with which God clothes us when he justifies us (Augustine passage included below). Although this was heretofore said imperfectly and he did not explain all things concerning imputation clearly, it nevertheless was pleasing that God's righteousness with which we are justified was taught.”
John Tetzel –
“As soon as a coin in the coffer rings / the soul from purgatory springs." Traveling town to town sometimes even burning his own hands to show the flames of hell and scare the people out of money.
Staging his show in the nave of the local church, Tetzel would announce, 'I have here the passports to lead the human soul to the celestial joys of paradise. The Holy Father [the Pope] has the power in heaven and earth to forgive sin, and if he forgives it, God must do so also'. The cost of the indulgence, Tetzel was quick to point out, was cheap when the alternatives were taken into account. Among the demons and tempests in the medieval world, the indulgence, no matter the price, offered a glimpse of light in a world of darkness. In Germany, Tetzel exceeded his quota, as he always did. Indulgences were most popular among the peasants, yet it also hit them the hardest; they had the least money to spare. Tetzel's indulgence-selling campaign led Martin Luther to act on the frustrations that were consuming his thoughts. When Luther posted his 'Ninety-Five Theses', the sales of indulgences dropped considerably.
The Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany, in the Holy Roman Empire, where the Ninety-Five Theses famously appeared, held one of Europe's largest collections of holy relics. At that time pious veneration, or viewing, of relics was purported to allow the viewer to receive relief from temporal punishment for sins in purgatory. By 1509 Frederick had over 5,000 relics, purportedly "including vials of the milk of the Virgin Mary, straw from the manger [of Jesus], and the body of one of the innocents massacred by King Herod."
Later John Calvin said “I suppose the Pope in Rome has so many pieces of the cross that he might build Noah’s ark.”
1517- October 31. Posts the 95 thesis on the castle church door at Wittenberg.
He felt compelled to expose the fraud that was being sold to the pious people. This exposure was to take place in the form of a public scholarly debate at the University of Wittenberg.
Luther protested against what he considered clerical abuses, especially in regard to indulgences.
Luther did not intend on Reforming the church, rather to initiate a debate or discussion assuming the church would be pious and biblical about it. The student or scholar wishing to engage in a disputation would post his points on a bulletin board on the university campus, and the list of propositions would serve as an invitation for a debate. Anyone who disagreed was welcome to publicly dispute the author. Such an exercise served to sharpen the intellect of students as well as to clarify questions among the learned, along with providing instruction to the audience. A student’s academic experience was not complete until he could stand on his own in a disputation.
Heidelberg and Liepzig
The Heidleberg disputation was a chance for Luther to express his findings and articulate his views to his Augustinian monks as well as other students and scholars. This led to the Liepzig (German for disputation) debate where he was challenged by Dr. John Eck on the topics of free will and grace. These ideas led to Luther’s authorship of his famous book The Bondage of the Will. Other topics of discussion where Purgatory, Papal authority and indulgences.
The Burning of the Bull- Luther is condemned for his teachings and the 95 thesis by the Pope so he is given a papal Bull which was a notice that his writings are heretical. He burns it.
1521- The Diet of Worms
Luther was promised safe passage by the church (As was Jan Huss) who was burned as a heretic to the Romans church despite his promise at the Council of Constance in 1415. He was condemned with the pope finding 41 errors with his theology. Luther was commanded to renounce his views.
The Edict of Worms condemned any follower of Luther.
Johann Eck, speaking on behalf of the Empire as assistant of the Archbishop of Trier, presented Luther with copies of his writings laid out on a table and asked him if the books were his, and whether he stood by their contents. Luther confirmed he was their author, but requested time to think about the answer to the second question. He prayed, consulted friends, and gave his response the next day:
Unless I am convinced by the testimony of the Scriptures or by clear reason (for I do not trust either in the pope or in councils alone, since it is well known that they have often erred and contradicted themselves), I am bound by the Scriptures I have quoted and my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and will not recant anything, since it is neither safe nor right to go against conscience. May God help me. Amen
Over the next five days, private conferences were held to determine Luther's fate. The Emperor presented the final draft of the Diet of Worms on 25 May 1521, declaring Luther an outlaw, banning his literature, and requiring his arrest: "We want him to be apprehended and punished as a notorious heretic."[56] It also made it a crime for anyone in Germany to give Luther food or shelter. It permitted anyone to kill Luther without legal consequence.
Upon leaving Worms
Luther's disappearance during his return trip was planned. Frederick III, Elector of Saxony had him intercepted on his way home by masked horsemen and escorted to the security of the Wartburg Castle at Eisenach. During his stay at Wartburg, which he referred to as "my Patmos", Luther translated the New Testament from Latin into German and poured out doctrinal and polemical writings. In this work, one of his most emphatic statements on faith, he argued that every good work designed to attract God's favor is a sin. All humans are sinners by nature, he explained, and God's grace, which cannot be earned, alone can make them just.
1522- Returns to Wittenberg secretly where he begins preaching and converting with his truth on justification by faith alone.
Peasants War breaks Out-
Rebels in Germany during the time of the reformation misunderstood Luther’s intentions and began warring against the nobles in Germany. Luther opposed violence of this sort and ultimately began speaking out against the revolts.
Marriage 1523 (same year as the German New testament Publication).
Katherina Von Bora was 26 years old, Luther was 41 years old when they married. She was 1 of 12 nuns who escaped a convent under Luther’s arrangement.
Children - Hans (Johannes), Elisabeth, Magdalena, Martin, Paul, Margaret
1531-34 Begins translating Old Testament into German
1534- Entire Bible Translated into German and released
1543- Death of his daughter Magdelena
1546- Feb. Preaches his last sermon
On 18 February 1546, aged 62, Luther died in Eisleben. His tomb is in the Castle Church in Wittenberg, beneath the pulpit.
Wir sein pettler. Hoc est verum “We are all beggars, this is true.
Author of “A Mighty Fortress is our God”. Hymn